.
Urban Renaissance Institute
Urban Renaissance Institute in the News: Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Our web site is
www.urban-renaissance.org
Here comes the sun
Nanosolar's breakthrough technology
is 10 times more powerful than a nuclear reactor and cheaper, too.
by Lawrence Solomon, National Post, June 24, 2008
Go to YouTube and you can see a corporate video of a printing press
running at 100 feet per minute, applying a nanoparticle ink to foil and
producing solar cells. This machine is owned by Nanosolar Inc., which in
turn is partly owned by Sergey Brin and Larry Page, the founders of
Google. This one printing machine, Nanosolar claims, can produce solar
cells with a capacity of 1,000 MW per year, the equivalent of a nuclear
reactor at Indian Point outside Manhattan or two nuclear reactors at
Pickering outside Toronto.
Unlike nuclear reactors, which take a decade to build and billions of
dollars in capital costs before delivering a single kilowatt-hour to a
home or business, Nanosolar's breakthrough technology can help meet
society's power needs soon after its ink has dried, and the press's
capital costs amount to a mere $1.65-million. Put another way, we can
wait 10 years to get nuclear power up and running. Or, by relying on a
single Nanosolar press, we can have the solar equivalent of a major
nuclear plant in one year, and the equivalent of 10 major plants in a
decade. Soon, says Nanosolar, its printing presses will be operating
much faster -- perhaps 20 times faster. Should this prove feasible, a
single Nanosolar press would pump out in a single decade the equivalent
of 200 nuclear plants -- far more than now exist in all of North
America.
To add to the slam-dunk superiority of Nanosolar-type technology over
nuclear, solar cells produce power when we especially need it -- when
people are awake and industries are humming. During the low-value
off-peak hours when power is in great surplus, the solar cells sleep,
too. Nuclear reactors, by contrast, can't ratchet down or turn off when
their output isn't needed. Off-peak nuclear power, in fact, is sometimes
produced at a loss because its operating costs exceeds the pittance
earned at, say, 3 a.m.
To get bang for the buck, and obtain the power that a growing economy
needs, nuclear and solar are as different as night and day. Nuclear
power, a half-century after the launch of the first generation of
nuclear reactors, remains an immature technology, each successive
generation proving to be not only unreliable but also subject to
ever-higher costs. Solar technology, in contrast, becomes ever more
reliable and ever less costly, and is only immature in the same way that
computer technology is immature -- there is no end in sight yet to how
far and fast it can go.
Nanosolar, founded in 2002 by two Stanford PhD candidates applying
Silicon Valley smarts, is a case in point. By the end of 2003, it had
obtained 60 patents, By 2004, it had developed its printing method. By
2006, it had published its results in a peer-reviewed journal and,
within months, raised $100-million. By the end of 2007 it had made its
first commercial shipment. Now Nanosolar can't keep up with the demand
-- its factory's output for the next 12-months is pre-sold.
Nanosolar's solar panels could go on rooftops but the company
recommends against this -- at least until building codes become flexible
enough to accommodate panels without the need to battle municipal
bureaucracies. Besides, it says, it is developing a residential product
sure to wow the homeowner.
In the meantime, it touts small municipal solar power plants that can
be up and running in one year on the outskirts of cities and towns,
where land is readily available. Each would be between 2 MW and 10 MW in
size -- enough to power 1,000 to 5,000 homes. Put one of these in
several hundred cities and a nuclear plant's worth of power would be
delivered, locally and in a decentralized manner, and without the
expensive and unsightly transmission towers that accompany large nuclear
plants.
As impressive as Nanosolar is, here's something more impressive
still: This company is but one of several with solar breakthroughs that
stand to revolutionize the energy world. Some of the competing solar
technologies are designed for large-scale applications, some small. In
this dynamic new energy marketplace, some will prosper and, doubtless,
some will fail, just as many of the computer pioneers in the 1970s and
1980s failed for one reason or another. But large or small, well
capitalized or not, the solar technologies are working more impressively
than anyone could have dreamed a decade ago and seem certain to overtake
nuclear as a provider of additional power to our electricity systems. If
the projections from Nanosolar and others prove accurate, in fact, they
will become the most economic power source of all, besting even coal.
Clean, limitless power is now within grasp, courtesy of those who
have reached for the sun.
Lawrence Solomon is executive director of
Energy Probe and
Urban
Renaissance Institute, and author of
The Deniers.
This is the first in a series on renewable energy.

Quote:
The survival
of democracy is dependent on successful representative government; and
that is conditioned upon the practice of electing to public offices only
those individuals who are technically trained, intellectually competent,
socially loyal, and morally fit. Only by such provisions can government
of the people, by the people, and for the people be preserved.
 |