US interventions in internal conflicts ‘alarming’ – Putin

Unless a free people are educated -- taught to think intelligently and plan wisely -- freedom usually does more harm than good. This forum is to help establish Cosmic insight interpreted in terms of planetary facts, needs, and goals. Help the worlds citizens to be informed by posting current information on World Events.

US interventions in internal conflicts ‘alarming’ – Putin

Unread postby Paul Kemp » Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:36 pm

Image
Image
Image
Home | News | Get Short URL
Published time: September 12, 2013 01:59
Edited time: September 13, 2013 10:41
Image
Image
Image

It is alarming that military intervention in internal conflicts has become commonplace for the US, President Vladimir Putin said in an editorial for The New York Times. Putin however has welcomed Barack Obama’s decision to develop a compromise on Syria.

In a lengthy piece titled A Plea for Caution from Russia, the President reminded that the United Nations was created as a universal instrument of preventing devastating wars.

“No one wants the United Nations to suffer the fate of the League of Nations, which collapsed because it lacked real leverage,” Putin wrote. “This is possible if influential countries bypass the United Nations and take military action without Security Council authorization.”

Putin said that while no one doubts that poison gas was indeed used in Syria, there is “every reason to believe it was used not by the Syrian Army, but by opposition forces, to provoke intervention by their powerful foreign patrons.”

“Reports that militants are preparing another attack — this time against Israel — cannot be ignored,” he added.

The potential strike by the United States against Syria, despite strong opposition from many countries and major political and religious leaders, including the pope, will result in more innocent victims and escalation, potentially spreading the conflict far beyond Syria’s borders. A strike would increase violence and unleash a new wave of terrorism.

Image
Image
Image

From the very beginning of the crisis, Russia has advocated a political solution according to international law.

“We are not protecting the Syrian government, but international law,” he said.

“It is alarming that military intervention in internal conflicts in foreign countries has become commonplace for the United States,” he said.

The world increasingly sees America not as “a model of democracy but as relying solely on brute force, cobbling coalitions together under the slogan “you’re either with us or against us,” the President stated.

On the other hand, a successful political compromise on Syria would “open the door to cooperation on other critical issues” between Russia and the US.

However, having studied Obama’s address to the American nation on Tuesday, Putin disagreed with a “case he made on American exceptionalism.”

“It is extremely dangerous to encourage people to see themselves as exceptional, whatever the motivation. There are big countries and small countries, rich and poor, those with long democratic traditions and those still finding their way to democracy. Their policies differ, too.”

“We are all different, but when we ask for the Lord’s blessings, we must not forget that God created us equal,” Putin said in conclusion of his New York Times editorial.
User avatar
Paul Kemp
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1022
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 5:36 pm
Location: Salt Springs
Are you a student of the Urantia Book?: Yes, I am a reader of the Uranta Book.
Urantia Book Study Poll: 29

Putin Challenges Obama Responsibly

Unread postby Paul Kemp » Sat Sep 14, 2013 12:19 am

Image
Putin Challenges Obama Responsibly
Image
ImageImageImage
Image
By Stephen Lendman
Global Research, September 13, 2013
Region: Middle East & North Africa, Russia and FSU
Theme: US NATO War Agenda
In-depth Report: SYRIA: NATO'S NEXT WAR?
Image
Image
Image

Russia’s going all out to avoid war on Syria. Vladimir Putin, Sergei Lavrov and other top officials are doing so responsibly.

On September 11, Putin addressed Americans and US officials directly.
His New York Times op-ed headlined ”A Plea for Caution From Russia,” saying:

“Recent events surrounding Syria prompted (him) to speak directly (at) a time of insufficient communication between our societies.”

Post-WW II, the UN was “established to prevent such devastation from ever happening again.” More on what Putin said below.

Post-WW I, “never again” was vowed. The League of Nations was created to assure it.
In August 1928, America, Germany, France, Britain, Italy, Japan, and nine other nations adopted the General Treaty for Renunciation of War as an Instrument of National Policy (Kellogg-Briand).

It promised wars would no longer resolve “disputes or conflicts of whatever nature or of whatever origin they may be, which may arise among them.”

Violators “should be denied the benefits furnished by this treaty.”

“Never again” was ignored. WW II followed. Hope again sprung eternal when it ended. It wasn’t to be.

UN Charter Preamble promises fell short of fulfillment, stating:

“WE THE PEOPLES OF THE UNITED NATIONS DETERMINED

    ●to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind, and

    ●to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small, and

    ●to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained, and

    ●to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom….”

The body affirms international support for tolerance, peace, security, and resolve to promote universal economic and social advancement.

It failed on all counts. Post-WW II, wars raged every year. They still do. America bears full responsibility. It deplores peace. It prioritizes war.

It does so for unchallenged global dominance. It vetoes Security Council resolutions opposing its imperial agenda. It’s waging war on humanity. Putin wants it stopped.

UN founders “understood that decisions affecting war and peace should happen only by consensus,” he said.
“No one wants the United Nations to” replicate League of Nations failure. It “collapsed because it lacked real leverage.”

It’s happening again “if influential countries (like America) bypass the United Nations and take military action without Security Council authorization,” Putin stressed.

If Washington wages war on Syria, “conflict (may spread) far beyond (its) borders.” War “would increase violence and unleash a new wave of terrorism.”

Doing so “could undermine multilateral efforts to resolve the Iranian nuclear problem and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.”

It would “further destabilize the Middle East and North Africa. It could throw the entire system of international law and order out of balance.”

Syria’s conflict is “fueled by foreign weapons supplied to the opposition.”

Throughout the conflict, CIA operatives supplied anti-government insurgents with weapons, funding, training and direction.

In late June, Russia Today said the agency stockpiled arms for insurgents in Jordan. They’re in secret warehouses. They include anti-tank missiles and other powerful weapons.

While East/West Syrian peace talks continue, CIA operatives actively aid anti-government forces. They do so covertly. Doing it undermines chances for peace.

Al Qaeda, Al Nusra, and other extremist elements are actively supported. They’re death squad killers. They’re terrorists. They’re invaders. They’re not homegrown.

They’re imported from dozens of foreign countries. Putin acknowledged their involvement. He raised concerns. “Might they not return to our countries with experience acquired in Syria,” he asked?

Since conflict erupted in March 2011, Russia urged “peaceful dialogue” resolution, Putin said. Syrians alone should determine their future. International law must be respected.

“We need to use the United Nations Security Council and believe that preserving law and order in today’s complex and turbulent world is one of the few ways to keep international relations from sliding into chaos,” Putin stressed.
“The law is still the law, and we must follow it whether we like it or not.”

“Under current international law, force is permitted only in self-defense or by the decision of the Security Council.”
“Anything else is unacceptable under the United Nations Charter and would constitute an act of aggression.”
“No one doubts that poison gas was used in Syria,” he added. He pointed fingers the right way. Government forces never used chemical weapons any time.

They weren’t involved in what happened on August 21 in Ghouta. “(T)here is every reason to believe opposition forces” bear full responsibility, said Putin.

They did so “to provoke intervention by their powerful foreign patrons, who would be siding with (extremist) fundamentalists.”

Reports indicate they’re “preparing another attack – this time against Israel.” They “cannot be ignored.”
Putin expressed grave concern about America initiating conflicts in numerous foreign countries. He called doing so “commonplace.”

“Is it in America’s long-term interest,” he asked? “I doubt it.”

“Millions around the world increasingly see America not as a model of democracy but as relying solely on brute force, cobbling coalitions together under the slogan ‘you’re either with us or against us.’ ”

Force is “ineffective and pointless,” Putin stressed. “Afghanistan is reeling.” Libya and Iraq are cauldrons of violence.
America bears full responsibility. Why do US officials “want to repeat (past) mistakes,” Putin asked?

Civilians suffer most in all wars. Stopping them matters most. Settling disputes diplomatically alone can avoid them.
A chance to prevent war on Syria “emerged in the past few days,” said Putin.

World leaders must embrace Assad’s willingness to place his chemical weapons under international control and destroy them.

Avoiding war on Syria improves chances for world peace. It “strengthen(s) mutual trust. (S)hared success open(s) the door to cooperation on other critical issues.”

Putin wants to work cooperatively with Obama. He strongly disagrees with him saying US policy “makes America different. It’s what makes us exceptional.”

This type rhetoric is “extremely dangerous,” said Putin. We’re all different, he added, “but when we ask for the Lord’s blessings, we must not forget that God created us equal.”

New York Times editors surprisingly gave Putin op-ed space. They’ve been hostile to his efforts to avoid war.

They’re against his support for Syrian sovereignty. They’re furious about his opposing Obama’s agenda. A separate Times article responded to his op-ed.

It headlined ”As Obama Pauses Action, Putin Takes Center Stage,” saying:
He’s “been many things to (Obama): a partner at times, an irritant more often, the host of the elusive Edward J. Snowden, and ‘the bored kid in the back of the classroom’ who offered so little on the administration’s foreign policy goals that Mr. Obama canceled plans to hold a summit meeting in Moscow last week.”

“(S)uddenly (Putin) eclipsed (Obama).” He’s the world’s leading peacemaker. He wants Syria’s conflict resolved diplomatically. He deplores war. He wants peace prioritized.

He’s “offering a potential, if still highly uncertain, alternative to what he has vocally criticized as America’s militarism and reasserted Russian interests in a region where it had been marginalized since the collapse of the Soviet Union,” said The Times.

He “handed a diplomatic lifeline to his longtime” Syrian ally. He slowed Obama’s rage for war. He bought time. He did so to give peace a chance. He faces long odds to achieve it.

Eureasia Group president Ian Bremmer said “Putin probably had his best day as president in years yesterday.”
It didn’t stop The Times from railing against him. They do it repeatedly. They do it unconscionably.

“When Mr. Putin returned to the presidency a year ago,” The Times said, “he moved aggressively to stamp out a growing protest movement and silence competing and independent voices.”

“He shored up his position at home but, as his government promoted nationalism with a hostile edge, passed antigay legislation, locked up illegal immigrants in a city camp, kept providing arms to the Syrian government and ultimately gave refuge to the leaker Mr. Snowden, Mr. Putin was increasingly seen in the West as a calloused, out-of-touch modern-day czar.”

Now (he’s) relishing” the role of “statesman.” He’s that and much more on resolving Syria’s crisis diplomatically. Don’t expect The Times to explain.

Obama prioritizes war. Putin’s a peacemaker. Justice demands stripping Obama of his Nobel Peace Prize. It was wrongfully awarded. Putin rightfully deserves it.

Not according to The Times. He “us(ed) (his) veto repeatedly to block any meaningful” Security Council action, it said.
He’s “intent on opposing the United States regardless of any contrary facts or evidence.”

The Times failed to point out any justifying its statement.” It can’t. None exists.

“Mr. Putin’s palpable hostility to what he views as the supersized influence of the United States around the world explains much of the anti-American sentiment that he and his supporters have stoked since he returned as president last year,” it said.

He temporarily succeeded in elevating diplomacy over force. Doing so “carries the risk of Russia (vetoing) any security council resolution that would back up the international control over Syria’s weapons with the threat of force, as France proposed.”

The Times backs Obama’s agenda. It supports ousting Assad. It endorses war to do so. It opposes Putin’s peace initiative.

An accompanying editorial headlined ”Diplomacy as Deterrent.” Times editors lied, saying:

“Russia will continue to make seemingly unreasonable demands until a deal is finally signed and is unlikely to admit that the Syrian regime carried out the gas attack.”

Throughout months of conflict, Russia acted responsibly. It’s doing so now. Putin opposes Obama’s agenda. He does so for good reason. He wants peace, not war.

No evidence links Syrian forces to chemical weapons attacks any time throughout months of conflict against insurgents or Syrian civilians.

Plenty shows Western-enlisted terrorists used them multiple times. Don’t expect Times editors to explain.

A Final Comment

CNN headlined ”White House responds to Putin’s NYT op-ed.” It did so through the cable channel’s chief Washington correspondent Jake Tapper.

He called Putin’s comments “stern (and) standoffish.” The White House said “(h)e put (his) proposal forward and he’s now invested in it. He now owns this. He has fully asserted ownership of it and he needs to deliver.”

Tapper left what’s most important unsaid. Obama wants war. He intends to get it. His plans are slowed. They’re not deterred.

He’ll go all out to obstruct Putin’s peace initiative. He’ll blame Russia’s president for doing it. So will supportive mainstream media.

Longstanding US plans call for ousting Assad. Replacing Syrian sovereignty with pro-Western subservient governance is prioritized. War is Obama’s option to do so.

Putin’s initiative changes nothing. Obama’s war machine intends pursuing what it does best. It wants Syria entirely ravaged and destroyed.

It wants Iran isolated. It wants Shah era harshness restored. Obama threatens world peace. It bears repeating. He’s waging war on humanity. He risks WW III.

Image
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
His new book is titled “Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity.”
http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanII.html
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.
Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.
It airs Fridays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour
http://www.dailycensored.com/putin-challenges-obama-responsibly/

Image
Related content:
ImageThe Dangers of American Exceptionalism: President Vladimir Putin Urges the U.S. not to Launch an Attack on Syria
‘It is extremely dangerous to encourage American people to see themselves as exceptional’ – Putin
The New York Times on Wednesday published a column by Vladimir Putin in which the Russian president urged the United States not to launch an…
Image
ImageBritish PM Falsely Claims Putin Dropped Support of Syria’s Assad PM David Cameron claimed Moscow was ready to talk about a transition of power in Syria, which was later denied by Putin Britain’s prime minister said on Tuesday Russian President Vladimir Putin has made it clear at the G20 summit in…
Image
ImagePutin touches the pawn and wins: Putin to become Russian PM?
Vladimir Putin has confounded all predictions by saying he would head United Russia’s federal list at the State Duma elections in December, and might become prime minister in 2008. This has created a funny, dramatic and paradoxical state of affairs.…
Image
ImageA World in Crisis: The Putin-Obama Talks Since reelected in March, Putin and Obama met for the first time on Monday at the Los Cabos, Mexico G20 meeting. Discussions focused on major geopolitical and economic issues. Differences on Syria remain unresolved. At a joint press conference, Putin…
Image
For media inquiries: publications@globalresearch.ca
Copyright © Stephen Lendman, Global Research, 2013
Image
Image

Image
Join the discussion:
You must be logged in to post a comment. If you haven't registered yet, click here to register. (It's quick, easy and free. And we won't give your email address to anyone.)
Image
User avatar
Paul Kemp
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1022
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 5:36 pm
Location: Salt Springs
Are you a student of the Urantia Book?: Yes, I am a reader of the Uranta Book.
Urantia Book Study Poll: 29

Former Pres. Carter calls diplomacy the way for solution - S

Unread postby Paul Kemp » Sat Sep 14, 2013 1:13 am

Image
Image
Image
Former Pres. Carter calls diplomacy the way for solution in Syria
Image
Home | USA | Get short URL
Published time: September 11, 2013 23:33
Image
Image
Image

Another major name in United States foreign policy is urging the White House to avoid a military strike on Syria. Former US president Jimmy Carter is calling for a diplomatic solution to resolve the Syrian conflict without involving the US military.

The thirty-ninth president of the US has previously decried the use of military force against Syrian leader Bashar Assad over the reported use of chemical weapons, on Wednesday this week the Washington Post published a passionate op-ed from the former commander-in-chief calling for the White House to resolve its issues without entering into battle.

Published only hours after US President Barack Obama said he was considering a Russian-brokered proposal that would disarm Syria of an arsenal of chemical weapons in order to divert an American missile strike, Carter cautioned that any use of military force could open the door for future problems, especially in light of recent talks involving the United Nations Security Council in lieu of launching an attack.

“The only way to be assured that Syrian chemical weapons will not be used in the future is not through a military strike but through a successful international effort,” Carter wrote.

Carter stressed that Obama should embrace diplomacy though the United Nations process.

“Regardless of the postponed congressional vote regarding the use of military force, other actions should be taken to address the situation in Syria, including an urgent effort to convene without conditions the long-delayed peace conference the United States and Russia announced in May. A resolution in the UN General Assembly to condemn any further use of chemical weapons, regardless of perpetrator, would be approved overwhelmingly, and the United States should support Russia’s proposal that Syria’s chemical weapons be placed under UN control,” he added. “A military strike by the United States is undesirable and will become unnecessary if this alternative proposal is strongly supported by the UN Security Council.”

The White House has made repeated calls for a military strike on Assad’s regime following a chemical weapons attack near Damascus on August 21 that took more than 1,400 lives. As a strike seemed to become increasingly imminent, Syria announced on Tuesday that it would consider surrendering an arsenal of warheads at the request of Russia.

Speaking from the White House early Wednesday, Obama administration press secretary Jay Carney said, “There is no question that the credible threat of US military force brought us this diplomatic open.”

“Until two days ago, Syria did not even acknowledge that it possessed chemical weapons. We have seen more cooperation and helpful activity on this matter from the Russians in the last two days then we’ve seen in the last two years, and I think that is clearly because of the President’s forceful comments about the need to hold Bashar al-Assad accountable for the use of chemical weapons against his own civilians,” Carney said.

Lawmakers in Washington may still decide to authorize the use of military force against Assad’s regime, but meanwhile Pres. Obama is awaiting the results of diplomatic discussions to determine how the Syrian leader should be reprimanded.

“The main goals of condemning the use of these outlawed weapons and preventing their further use can still be realized by concerted international action,” Carter wrote.

The former president outlined many of the same pleas for diplomacy during a speech Tuesday at the Carter Center in Georgia. In the speech, he said it’s still unknown who ordered the attack on Aug. 21.

"We have a situation where everyone agrees that chemical weapons were used, with varying accounts of how many people were killed ... But exactly who gave the orders is still unproven," Carter said.

Image
Image

Image
Join the discussion:
You must be logged in to post a comment. If you haven't registered yet, click here to register. (It's quick, easy and free. And we won't give your email address to anyone.)
Image
User avatar
Paul Kemp
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1022
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 5:36 pm
Location: Salt Springs
Are you a student of the Urantia Book?: Yes, I am a reader of the Uranta Book.
Urantia Book Study Poll: 29

Re: US interventions in internal conflicts ‘alarming’ – Puti

Unread postby Paul Kemp » Sat Sep 14, 2013 8:32 pm

Image
General W. Clark tells truth about Middle East "Uprising"
Image
[ flash ]
Image
Image
Published on Jan 21, 2013
Image

Image

Image
Join the discussion:
You must be logged in to post a comment. If you haven't registered yet, click here to register. (It's quick, easy and free. And we won't give your email address to anyone.)
Image
User avatar
Paul Kemp
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1022
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 5:36 pm
Location: Salt Springs
Are you a student of the Urantia Book?: Yes, I am a reader of the Uranta Book.
Urantia Book Study Poll: 29

Fully Exposed - The Obama Invasion of Syria (Please Share)

Unread postby Paul Kemp » Sat Sep 14, 2013 8:43 pm

Image
Fully Exposed - The Obama Invasion of Syria (Please Share)
Image
[ flash ]
Image
Image
Published on Sep 8, 2013
Another exception video by Jason A, keep up the great work

Subscribe and watch his other videos here:

Image

Image

Image
Join the discussion:
You must be logged in to post a comment. If you haven't registered yet, click here to register. (It's quick, easy and free. And we won't give your email address to anyone.)
Image
User avatar
Paul Kemp
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1022
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 5:36 pm
Location: Salt Springs
Are you a student of the Urantia Book?: Yes, I am a reader of the Uranta Book.
Urantia Book Study Poll: 29


Return to Urantia Broadcast - World News Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

cron