.
        Urban Renaissance Institute
        
        Urban Renaissance Institute in the News: Tuesday, June 24, 2008
        Our web site is
        
        www.urban-renaissance.org  
         
        Here comes the sun 
        
        
          Nanosolar's breakthrough technology 
          is 10 times more powerful than a nuclear reactor and cheaper, too. 
         
        
        by Lawrence Solomon, National Post, June 24, 2008  
        Go to YouTube and you can see a corporate video of a printing press 
        running at 100 feet per minute, applying a nanoparticle ink to foil and 
        producing solar cells. This machine is owned by Nanosolar Inc., which in 
        turn is partly owned by Sergey Brin and Larry Page, the founders of 
        Google. This one printing machine, Nanosolar claims, can produce solar 
        cells with a capacity of 1,000 MW per year, the equivalent of a nuclear 
        reactor at Indian Point outside Manhattan or two nuclear reactors at 
        Pickering outside Toronto.  
        Unlike nuclear reactors, which take a decade to build and billions of 
        dollars in capital costs before delivering a single kilowatt-hour to a 
        home or business, Nanosolar's breakthrough technology can help meet 
        society's power needs soon after its ink has dried, and the press's 
        capital costs amount to a mere $1.65-million. Put another way, we can 
        wait 10 years to get nuclear power up and running. Or, by relying on a 
        single Nanosolar press, we can have the solar equivalent of a major 
        nuclear plant in one year, and the equivalent of 10 major plants in a 
        decade. Soon, says Nanosolar, its printing presses will be operating 
        much faster -- perhaps 20 times faster. Should this prove feasible, a 
        single Nanosolar press would pump out in a single decade the equivalent 
        of 200 nuclear plants -- far more than now exist in all of North 
        America.  
        To add to the slam-dunk superiority of Nanosolar-type technology over 
        nuclear, solar cells produce power when we especially need it -- when 
        people are awake and industries are humming. During the low-value 
        off-peak hours when power is in great surplus, the solar cells sleep, 
        too. Nuclear reactors, by contrast, can't ratchet down or turn off when 
        their output isn't needed. Off-peak nuclear power, in fact, is sometimes 
        produced at a loss because its operating costs exceeds the pittance 
        earned at, say, 3 a.m.  
        To get bang for the buck, and obtain the power that a growing economy 
        needs, nuclear and solar are as different as night and day. Nuclear 
        power, a half-century after the launch of the first generation of 
        nuclear reactors, remains an immature technology, each successive 
        generation proving to be not only unreliable but also subject to 
        ever-higher costs. Solar technology, in contrast, becomes ever more 
        reliable and ever less costly, and is only immature in the same way that 
        computer technology is immature -- there is no end in sight yet to how 
        far and fast it can go.  
        Nanosolar, founded in 2002 by two Stanford PhD candidates applying 
        Silicon Valley smarts, is a case in point. By the end of 2003, it had 
        obtained 60 patents, By 2004, it had developed its printing method. By 
        2006, it had published its results in a peer-reviewed journal and, 
        within months, raised $100-million. By the end of 2007 it had made its 
        first commercial shipment. Now Nanosolar can't keep up with the demand 
        -- its factory's output for the next 12-months is pre-sold.  
        Nanosolar's solar panels could go on rooftops but the company 
        recommends against this -- at least until building codes become flexible 
        enough to accommodate panels without the need to battle municipal 
        bureaucracies. Besides, it says, it is developing a residential product 
        sure to wow the homeowner.  
        In the meantime, it touts small municipal solar power plants that can 
        be up and running in one year on the outskirts of cities and towns, 
        where land is readily available. Each would be between 2 MW and 10 MW in 
        size -- enough to power 1,000 to 5,000 homes. Put one of these in 
        several hundred cities and a nuclear plant's worth of power would be 
        delivered, locally and in a decentralized manner, and without the 
        expensive and unsightly transmission towers that accompany large nuclear 
        plants.  
        As impressive as Nanosolar is, here's something more impressive 
        still: This company is but one of several with solar breakthroughs that 
        stand to revolutionize the energy world. Some of the competing solar 
        technologies are designed for large-scale applications, some small. In 
        this dynamic new energy marketplace, some will prosper and, doubtless, 
        some will fail, just as many of the computer pioneers in the 1970s and 
        1980s failed for one reason or another. But large or small, well 
        capitalized or not, the solar technologies are working more impressively 
        than anyone could have dreamed a decade ago and seem certain to overtake 
        nuclear as a provider of additional power to our electricity systems. If 
        the projections from Nanosolar and others prove accurate, in fact, they 
        will become the most economic power source of all, besting even coal.
         
        Clean, limitless power is now within grasp, courtesy of those who 
        have reached for the sun.  
        Lawrence Solomon is executive director of
        
        Energy Probe and
        
        Urban 
        Renaissance Institute, and author of 
        
        
        The Deniers.  
        This is the first in a series on renewable energy.  
        
          
          
        
          
        
        Quote: 
        The survival 
        of democracy is dependent on successful representative government; and 
        that is conditioned upon the practice of electing to public offices only 
        those individuals who are technically trained, intellectually competent, 
        socially loyal, and morally fit. Only by such provisions can government 
        of the people, by the people, and for the people be preserved. 
         
        
           |