We now stand at the edge of the global
financial abyss of a ‘Great Global Debt Depression,’ where
nations, mired in extreme debt, are beginning to implement
‘fiscal austerity’ measures to reduce their deficits, which
will ultimately result in systematic global social genocide,
as the middle classes vanish and the social foundations upon
which our nations rest are swept away. How did we get here?
Who brought us here? Where is this road leading? These are
questions I will briefly attempt to answer.
At the heart of the global political economy is the central
banking system. Central banks are responsible for printing a
nation’s currency and setting interest rates, thus
determining the value of the currency. This should no doubt
be the prerogative of a national government, however,
central banks are of a particularly deceptive nature, in
which while being imbued with governmental authority, they
are in fact privately owned by the world’s major global
banks, and are thus profit-seeking institutions. How do
central banks make a profit? The answer is simple: how do
all banks make a profit? Interest on debt. Loans are made,
interest rates are set, and profits are made. It is a system
of debt, imperial economics at its finest.
In the United States, President Woodrow Wilson signed the
Federal Reserve Act in 1913, creating the Federal Reserve
System, with the Board located in Washington, appointed by
the President, but where true power rested in the 12
regional banks, most notably among them, the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York. The regional Fed banks were private banks,
owned in shares by the major banks in each region, which
elected the board members to represent them, and who would
then share power with the Federal Reserve Board in
Washington.
In the early 1920s, the Council on Foreign Relations was
formed in the United States as the premier foreign policy
think tank, dominated by powerful banking interests. In
1930, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) was
created to manage German reparations payments, but it also
had another role, which was much less known, but much more
significant. It was to act as a “coordinator of the
operations of central banks around the world.” Essentially,
it is the central bank for the world’s central banks, whose
operations are kept ‘strictly confidential.’ As historian
Carroll Quigley wrote:
"The powers of financial capitalism had
another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a
world system of financial control in private hands able to
dominate the political system of each country and the
economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be
controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of
the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at
in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of
the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements
in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled
by the world’s central banks which were themselves private
corporations."
In 1954, the Bilderberg Group was formed as a secretive
global think tank, comprising intellectual, financial,
corporate, political, military and media elites from Western
Europe and North America, with prominent bankers such as
David Rockefeller, as well as European royalty, such as the
Dutch royal family, who are the largest shareholders in
Royal Dutch Shell, whose CEO attends every meeting. This
group of roughly 130 elites meets every year in secret to
discuss and debate global affairs, and to set general goals
and undertake broad agendas at various meetings. The group
was initially formed to promote European integration. The
1956 meeting discussed European integration and a common
currency. In fact, the current Chairman of the Bilderberg
Group told European media last year that the euro was
debated at the Bilderberg Group.
In 1973, David Rockefeller, Chairman and CEO of Chase
Manhattan Bank, Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations
and a member of the Steering Committee of the Blderberg
Group, formed the Trilateral Commission with CFR academic
Zbigniew Brzezinski. That same year, the oil price shocks
created a wealth of oil money, which was discussed at that
years Bilderberg meeting 5 months prior to the oil shocks,
and the money was funneled through western banks, which
loaned it to ‘third world’ nations desperately in need of
loans to finance industrialization.
When Jimmy Carter became President in 1977, he appointed
over two dozen members of the Trilateral Commission into his
cabinet, including himself, and of course, Zbigniew
Brzezinski, who was his National Security Adviser. In 1979,
Carter appointed David Rockefeller’s former aide and friend,
Paul Volcker, who had held various positions at the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York and the U.S. Treasury Department,
and who also happened to be a member of the Trilateral
Commission, as Chairman of the Federal Reserve. When another
oil shock took place in 1979, Volcker decided to raise
interest rates from 2% in the late 70s, to 18% in the early
80s. The effect this had was that the countries of the
developing world suddenly had to pay enormous interest on
their loans, and in 1982, Mexico announced it could no
longer afford to pay its interest, and it defaulted on its
debt, which set off the 1980s debt crisis – collapsing
nations in debt across Latin America, Africa and parts of
Asia.
It was the IMF and the World Bank came to the ‘assistance’
of the Third World with their ‘structural adjustment
programs’, which forced countries seeking assistance to
privatize all state owned industries and resources, devalue
their currencies, liberalize their economies, dismantle
health, education and social services; ultimately resulting
in the re-colonization of the ‘Third World’ as Western
corporations and banks bought all their assets and
resources, and ultimately created the conditions of social
genocide, with the spread of mass poverty, and the emergence
of corrupt national elites who were subservient to the
interests of Western elites. The people in these nations
would protest, riot and rebel, and the states would clamp
down with the police and military.
In the West, corporations and banks saw rapid,
record-breaking profits. This was the era in which the term
‘globalization’ emerged. While profits soared, wages for
people in the West did not. Thus, to consume in an economy
in which prices were rising, people had to go into debt.
This is why this era marked the rise of credit cards fueling
consumption, and the middle class became a class based
entirely on debt.
In the 1990s, the ‘new world order’ was born, with America
ruling the global economy, free trade agreements began
integrating regional and global markets for the benefit of
global banks and corporations, and speculation dominated the
economy.
The global economic crisis arose as a result of decades of
global imperialism – known recently as ‘globalization’ – and
the reckless growth of– speculation, derivatives and an
explosion of debt. As the economic crisis spread, nations of
the world, particularly the United States, bailed out the
major banks (which should have been made to fail and crumble
under their own corruption and greed), and now the West has
essentially privatized profits for the banks, and socialized
the risk. In other words, the nations bought the debt from
the banks, and now the people have to pay for it. The
people, however, are immersed in their own personal debt to
such degrees that today, the average Canadian is $39,000 in
debt, and students are graduating into a jobless market with
tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars of student debt
that they will never repay. Hence, we are now faced with a
global debt crisis.
To manage the economic crisis, the G20 was established as
the major international forum for cooperation among the 20
major economies of the world, including the major developing
– or emerging – economies, such as India, Brazil, South
Africa and China. At the onset of the financial crisis,
China and Russia’s central banks began calling for the
establishment of a global currency to replace the U.S.
dollar as the world reserve currency. This proposal was
backed by the UN and the IMF. It should be noted, however,
that the Chinese and Russian central banks cooperate with
the Western central banks through the Bank for International
Settlements – which the President of the European Central
Bank, Jean-Claude Trichet, recently said was the principle
forum for “governance of central bank cooperation” and that
the G20 is “the prime group for global economic governance.”
In 2009, the IMF stated that the BIS “is the central and the
oldest focal point for coordination of global governance
arrangements.” The President of the European Union,
appointed to the position after attending a Bilderberg
meeting, declared 2009 as the “first year of global
governance.” The 2009 Bilderberg meeting reported on the
desire to create a global treasury, or global central bank,
to manage the world economy. In 2009, prior to the
Bilderberg meeting in fact, the G20 set in motion plans to
make the IMF a global central bank of sorts, issuing and
even printing its own currency – called Special Drawing
Rights (SDRs) – which is valued against a basket of
currencies. In May of 2010, the IMF Managing Director stated
that “crisis is an opportunity,” and while Special Drawing
Rights are a step in the right direction, ultimately what is
needed is “a new global currency issued by a global central
bank, with robust governance and institutional features.”
Thus, we see the emergence of a process towards the
formation of a global central bank and a global currency,
totally unaccountable to any nation or people, and totally
controlled by global banking interests.
In 2010, Greece was plunged into a debt crisis, a crisis
which is now spreading across Europe, to the U.K. and
eventually to Japan and the United States. If we look at
Greece, we see the nature of the global debt crisis. The
debt is owed to major European and American banks. To pay
the interest on the debt, Greece had to get a loan from the
European Central Bank and the IMF, which forced the country
to impose ‘fiscal austerity’ measures as a condition for the
loans, pressuring Greece to commit social genocide.
Meanwhile, the major banks of America and Europe speculate
against the Greek debt, further plunging the country into
economic and social crisis. The loan is granted, to pay the
interest, yet simply has the effect of adding to the overall
debt, as a new loan is new debt. Thus, Greece is caught in
the same debt trap that re-colonized the Third World.
At the recent G20 meeting in Toronto, the major nations of
the world agreed to impose fiscal austerity – or in other
words, commit social genocide – within their nations, in a
veritable global structural adjustment program. So now we
will see the beginnings of the Great Global Debt Depression,
in which major western and global nations cut social
spending, create mass unemployment by dismantling health,
education, and social services. Further, state
infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, airports, ports,
railways, prisons, hospitals, electric transmission lines
and water – will be privatized, so that global corporations
and banks will own the entirely of national assets.
Simultaneously, of course, taxes will be raised dramatically
to levels never before seen. The BIS said that interest
rates should rise at the same time, meaning that interest
payments on debt will dramatically increase at both the
national and individual level, forcing governments to turn
to the IMF for loans – likely in the form of its new global
reserve currency – to simply pay the interest, and will thus
be absorbing more debt. Simultaneously, of course, the
middle class will in effect have its debts called in, and
since the middle class exists only as an illusion, the
illusion will vanish.
Already, towns, cities, and states across America are
resorting to drastic actions to reduce their debts, such as
closing fire stations, scaling back trash collection,
turning off street lights, ending bus services and public
transportation, cutting back on library hours or closing
them altogether, school districts cutting down the school
day, week or year. Simultaneously, this is occurring with a
dramatic increase in the rate of privatizations or
“public-private partnerships” in which even libraries are
being privatized.
No wonder then, that this month, the Managing Director of
the IMF warned that America and Europe, in the midst of the
worst jobs crisis since the Great Depression, face an
“explosion of social unrest.” Just yesterday, Europe
experienced a wave of mass protests and social unrest in
opposition to ‘austerity measures’, with a general strike in
Spain involving millions of people, and a march on the EU
headquarters in Brussels of nearly 100,000 people. As social
unrest spreads, governments will likely react – as we saw in
the case of the G20 in Toronto – with oppressive police
state measures. Here, we see the true relevance of the
emergence of ‘Homeland Security States’, designed not to
protect people from terrorists, but to protect the powerful
from the people.
So while things have never seemed quite so bleak, there is a
dim and growing beacon of hope, in what Zbigniew Brzezinski
has termed as the greatest threat to elite interests
everywhere – the ‘global political awakening’. The global
political awakening is representative of the fact that for
the first time in all of human history, mankind is
politically awakened and stirring, activated and aware, and
that generally – as Zbigniew Brzezinski explains – generally
is aware of global inequalities, exploitation, and
disrespect. This awakening is largely the result of the
information revolution – thus revealing the contradictory
nature of the globalization project – as while it globalizes
power and oppression, so too does it globalize awareness and
opposition. This awakening is the greatest threat to
entrenched elite interests everywhere. The awakening, while
having taken root in the global south – already long
subjected to exploitation and devastation – is now stirring
in the west, and will grow as the economy crumbles. As the
middle classes realize their consumption was an illusion of
wealth, they will seek answers and demand true change, not
the Wall Street packaged ‘brand-name’ change of Obama Inc.,
but true, inspired, and empowering change.
In 1967, Martin Luther King delivered a speech in which he
spoke out against the Vietnam War and the American empire,
and he stated that, “It seems as if we are on the wrong side
of a world revolution.” So now it seems to me that the time
has come for that to change.
 |